<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who did Oakeshott Influence?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michael-oakeshott-association.com/index.php" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michael-oakeshott-association.com/index.php/archives/737</link>
	<description>We promote knowledge and critical discussion of the British philosopher Michael Oakeshott (1901-90)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 05:30:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: web master</title>
		<link>http://www.michael-oakeshott-association.com/index.php/archives/737/comment-page-1#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>web master</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 06:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michael-oakeshott-association.com/?p=737#comment-103</guid>
		<description>A Single World of Ideas (follow the pingback) thinks my measure of &quot;influence&quot;, borrowed from R.W. Southern, sets the bar too high, and points us towards Collingwood&#039;s point that relations of influence can be relationships in which &quot;the conclusions reached by one thinker [gave] rise to problems for the next.&quot;

It is a worthwhile point, covering philosophers who have exerted influence by setting an agenda (even an agenda for opponents) rather than by founding a school of admiring imitators.

But I&#039;m not sure that Oakeshott ranks any higher on this criterion than on Southern&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Single World of Ideas (follow the pingback) thinks my measure of &#8220;influence&#8221;, borrowed from R.W. Southern, sets the bar too high, and points us towards Collingwood&#8217;s point that relations of influence can be relationships in which &#8220;the conclusions reached by one thinker [gave] rise to problems for the next.&#8221;</p>
<p>It is a worthwhile point, covering philosophers who have exerted influence by setting an agenda (even an agenda for opponents) rather than by founding a school of admiring imitators.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m not sure that Oakeshott ranks any higher on this criterion than on Southern&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Influence and Success &#171; A Single World of Ideas</title>
		<link>http://www.michael-oakeshott-association.com/index.php/archives/737/comment-page-1#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Influence and Success &#171; A Single World of Ideas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michael-oakeshott-association.com/?p=737#comment-102</guid>
		<description>[...] and&#160;Success 2009 March 16    by singleworldofideas   The MOA blog asks, who did Oakeshott influence?, before dismissing the most obvious candidates for reasons that, I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and&nbsp;Success 2009 March 16    by singleworldofideas   The MOA blog asks, who did Oakeshott influence?, before dismissing the most obvious candidates for reasons that, I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

